Dear Editor,
18 years after the immolation of the World Trade Centre we now have scientific evidence that the official story is false and misleading.
The engineering department of the University of Alaska Fairbanks has recently released the results of a four-year forensic examination of the collapse of World Trade Centre 7.
You may recall that building 7 was a 47-story highrise that collapsed into its own footprint in the afternoon of the day the Twin Towers were destroyed. Building 7 was not hit by an airplane.
There are plenty of videos documenting the fall of building 7 and any layman can see that it appears to be a classic demolition. FEMA issued a report on the destruction in May of ‘02 and concluded that further investigation was needed. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was then tasked with analysing the collapse. After seven years of feet dragging NIST produced their report in 2008 and concluded the collapse was caused by fire. Since then various experts (including an ex NIST employee) pointed out that the study was flawed and could not be supported.
The U of A study titled – A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Centre 7 is now available to the public. You can read it from a technical viewpoint or simply skip to the conclusions.
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on
9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse.”
“The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure
involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
So where is our watchdog media? CBC? New York Times? CNN? Macleans? Yoohoo, anyone? We have evidence the event that kickstarted America’s massive killing spree in the Middle East may well have been a homemade sacrifice.
In mainstream journalism failure = success.
Brian Mckirdy
Valemount, BC
